It seems to me it says that the actual object changes; or the "object of perception" is not the object itself?
Epicurus Reader
TEXT 68: Sextus M 7.203-16 (247 Usener)
But rather [I would say] that [the vision] tells the
truth, since when the object of perception appears to it [as] small and
of such a shape it is genuinely small and of such a shape (for the edges of
the images are broken off by the movement through the air), and when it
again appears big and of a different shape, again it is in a similar manner
big and has that different shape-
the object being, however, now not the
same in the two cases. For it remains for distorted opinion to think that
the same object of presentation was observed from close up and from a
distance.